How Joe Biden Celebrated Planned Parenthood v. Casey
See "Joe Biden is One Sick Pro-Abort" at Catholics Against Joe Biden.
See "Joe Biden is One Sick Pro-Abort" at Catholics Against Joe Biden.
Amy Welborn offers a provocative resolution for discussion:
The discussion of the post below is veering, quite naturally, to the subject of Roe and the place of legal restrictions on abortion in the pro-life movement.My own thoughts on the subject can be read here and here. Be sure to check in over at Amy's every so often to follow the discussion.
So, we might as well go ahead and go there. I have company drifting in over the next few hours, so I really am not in the proper frame of mind to compose a post, so I’ll be lazy and just throw this out there:Resolved:Discuss.
The anti-abortion movement should abandon any attempts to overturn Roe v. Wade or even work for legal restrictions on abortion. That battle has been lost. Further, it is not required, from the standpoint of Catholic teaching, to work towards criminalization of or restrictions on abortion.
Paul Kengor on Why the Rudy Rejection Matters (National Catholic Register):
The reality is that the rejection of Rudy by Republicans should not be brushed off lightly and quickly; it merits pause for careful reflection, and perhaps even celebration.However, if Obama's momentum persists as it has been, we may very well find ourselves with a president wholeheartedly committed to the preservation of the "right to choice" under Roe v. Wade. There's the rub.Let there be no doubt that Rudy was refused because of outrage at how he proudly and unequivocally supports a “woman’s right to choose.” This was a Republican religious rejection of Rudy. He was rejected not only by evangelicals but by the pro-life Catholics who share his party and his faith.
Yet, it was also much more, especially for Republicans and for Catholics. Consider the big picture:
Over the last two or three decades, the Democratic Party has increasingly championed policies that extinguish what Pope John Paul II and his Church have called the first of all freedoms and the most basic of all human rights: the right to life.
Since Roe v. Wade, and particularly since Ronald Reagan’s election in 1981, the Republican Party (by and large) has not sacrificed its soul at the altar of political expediency on the abortion issue. Republicans like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush have battled dogmatic abortion advocates in the Democratic Party like Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi and now Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, for whom abortion remains a kind of political sacrament, even though some of them are Catholic. . . .
All of this now brings us to a historic crossroads: Thanks to pro-life diligence by certain Republicans, and particularly two decades of generally decent court appointments by Reagan and Bush (along with some obvious failures), Roe v. Wade has the chance of being reversed under the next president.
And that’s where denying Rudy Giuliani the 2008 Republican nomination and the presidency becomes so profoundly important: If Roe v. Wade is reversed, Catholics, and Catholics who are Republican, will be spared the shame of a Catholic Republican president unable to understand or make the moral case against abortion. They will be spared the spectacle of a Catholic Republican president voicing his “personal disagreement” with the decision.
Posted by
Christopher Blosser
|
Labels: George W. Bush, Judicial Appointments, Pro-Life Movement, Rudy Giuliani
Ted Olson, a former Republican Solicitor General under President George Bush, is a big catch for McCain because Olson's credentials as a conservative jurist are impeccable. Olson will co-chair the McCain Judicial Advisory Committee, which will give input on whom McCain appoints to federal courts, including the Supreme Court. The other co-chair is Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback, a leading pro-life Catholic politician. Here is Olson on McCain:John McCain has a deep-rooted conservative philosophy and I trust him to appoint strict constructionists, like Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito, to judicial positions.
See link for full endorsement.
Labels: Judicial Appointments
Following the 2004 Presidential election, we've expanded our discussion to cover the public policy decisions of Catholics in public service on both sides of the political divide.
During the 2008 election, CPS was pleased to contribute to the efforts of both Catholics Against Rudy and Catholics Against Biden, in light of the deviations of both from Catholic teaching on abortion.
Our present contributors are Jay Anderson of Pro Ecclesia * Pro Familia * Pro Civitate; Stephen Dillard (of Southern Appeal; Jeff Miller aka. The Curt Jester; David Schrader of Catholics for Bush and Christopher Blosser of Against The Grain.
The CPS Blogroll
Bloggers to the political right, left and center covering topics of mutual interest.
PLEASE NOTE: listing does not necessarily imply an endorsement of a blogger's opinions on various issues.
After AbortionOrganizations
The Acton Institute
Catholic Action Network
Catholic Answers
Catholics For the Common Good
Catholics in the Military
CatholicVoter.Net
Courage Apostolate
Ethics & Public Policy Center
Fidelis
Federalist Society
Human Life International
Notre Dame Center for Ethics & Culture
One Nation Under God
Priests For Life
Thomas More Law Center
News Resources
Catholic News Agency
Catholic News Service
Catholic World News
CNN.com
Google News
LifeSiteNews.com
New York Times
Yahoo News
Zenit News Service
Periodicals
National Catholic Reporter
National Catholic Register
The Hill
Crisis Magazine
National Review
Weekly Standard